NORDSTROM -  Shop the Fall Clearance Sale for Men, Women & Kids through November 13

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Some of Rodarte's Target Collection Echos Jean Seberg's Style


Pictured: Fashion Magic, Jean Seberg in her bow collar little black dress.

So I'm still coming down off my Jimmy Choo H&M fashion fix, and checking out what is actually coming for the Christmas holiday season. Naturally, my thoughts turn to Target's upcoming Rodarte collection launching in stores Dec. 20th, 2009. The recent issue of Marie Claire magazine had a few more preview pictures of the collection. In the article, the designers, the Mulleavy sisters credit some of their favorite films (Bonnie & Clyde, Harold & Maude and Rosemary's Baby) with offering them inspiration for their collection. Frankly, I don't see it. I saw someone else in the pieces of the collection that I like. And I am not talking about the dreadful skeleton dress with sequins pictured in the Marie Claire article. I'm talking about the little black dress (pictured below) with the bow tie at the neck. The dress is a dead ringer for a dress one of my favorite film style icons, Jean Seberg, wore as Cecile during the nightclub sequence from "Bonjour Tristesse" (1958). Compare the photos for yourself.

Pictured: The Rodarte Lace Dress from their Target collection. The dress is rumored to be priced between $45.00 to $50.00 USD.



Pictured: Jean Seberg over 40 years ago, posing in a very similar style black dress with bow at the neck. She was just 20 years old.

As you can see, Jean's dress had the same halter design top, exposing bare shoulders with the little bow at the neck. Her dress had the same flared full skirt and cinched waist as the Rodarte Target dress. I believe this dress was designed by Givenchy for Jean. Regrettably, neither she or her films were mentioned as an inspiration for the Mulleavy sisters in the Marie Claire piece. And the black dress is not the only reminder of Jean apparent in the collection. If you've seen Breathless and A-Bout-De-Souffle (as I have many times), then you know that Jean popularized the boat neck top with stripes. Here is a picture of her in one of those tops.

Pictured: Jean with some fabulous french accessories, a striped top, a Renoir print and Jean-Paul Belmondo.


Compare Jean's striped top above to the top by Rodarte for Target in the Marie Clarie article below.

Pictured: The Rodarte for Target stripped top with faux-lambskin vest
(photo from Marie Claire)

I'm glad to see some of Jean's style is still alive and well. I can't honestly say that I am a fan of the overall Rodarte Target collection based on the advance pictures I've seen (the skeleton dress looks like a Halloween costume to me.)

But the black Jean Seberg style dress is as beautiful today as it was decades ago on the actress. I hope the version that hits the Target racks will be as similar to Jean's dress as the pictures in this post are. If it is, then it will merit the approximately $45.00 USD price tag.

Pictured: The "other" Rodarte Target dress. Trick or Treat?

Je préfère le style Jean Seberg.


PS. Anyone who grows up in Iowa, learns to speak French fluently, becomes part of the French "new wave" cinema and sparkles on screen as Jean Seberg did deserves to be remembered!!

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Amelia Earhart Fashion Designer : Her Affordable Take On Fashion in the 1930s Resonates Today

Pictured: A beautiful and seldom seen photo of Amelia from a poster for her lecture tour. Her aviator pin, pearls and open collar look is wearable today.

The fall fashion collections are alive with echos of Amelia Earhart. There are aviator jackets everywhere from Arden B. to Topshop.

Pictured: Arden B.'s affordable, Amelia Earhart inspired "flight jacket" is $58.00, US.

Amelia Earhart styled jumpsuits are featured in many collections for 2010. The Topshop Massive Jumpsuit by Boutique channels Amelia and is almost sold out.

Pictured: Almost gone: Topshop's Massive Jumpsuit by Boutique is selling for $135.00 US.

If you've seen the movie Amelia with Hillary Swank, then you may know that Amelia Earhart had her own fashion line. I had read and studied a lot about Earhart in college, but one fact I never knew was that she was one of the first celebrities to endorse and market a fashion line.

In 1934, Amelia created a line of fashions known as “Amelia Earhart Fashions.” The line was sold at Macy’s in New York and Marshall Fields’ in Chicago. The movie Amelia only briefly touches on the many products that Miss Earhart endorsed in order to finance her flying expeditions. The movie show her modeling and promoting her fashions and a luggage line. After seeing the movie, I was keen to learn more about Amelia’s involvement with fashion during the 1930s. Most of the well-known pictures of Amelia that I had seen showed her dressed in her aviator attire. Remember the famous Gap advertising campaign, showing Amelia in her bomber jacket and khaki pants in the 1990s? The commonly known picture of Amelia is one of aviator goggles perched on her head, a leather flying cap on her head, a scarf at her neck blowing in the wind wearing her trademark leather bomber jacket. So I was surprised to learn, that Amelia showed and designed some stylish suits and dresses. These were the staples of her 1934 fashion line. My desire to learn more about Amelia and her flight of fashion fancy, lead me to uncover some lesser known facts about her life.

Amelia studied sewing as a young girl growing up in Kansas. She didn’t play with dolls like other girls did. But she did design and make beautiful clothing for her dolls. Her early career was as a social worker, not as a pilot. As a social worker in Kansas her income was limited, and it seems that making her own clothing was a way for her to remain stylish and live within her means. Later, she carried this knowledge of sewing and design into her career as a pilot. This was part of the genius of Amelia Earhart; she was an excellent promoter of her own brand. Tall, slender and beautiful, she wore clothing as fashionably as a model on a runway. As a pilot, her first foray into design was to create a jumpsuit that she could wear comfortably in the cockpit. She designed a flying suit with loose trousers, a zipper top and big pockets for the Ninety-Nines (an association of 99 women pilots.) This was her typical work attire. But off the runway, Amelia was much more fashion conscious. In the 1930s, she frequently wore the designs of Elsa Schiaparelli. She was always conscious of her image and appeared in fashion spreads in Vogue magazine and Cosmopolitan (where she was also an editor.)

Pictured: Amelia Earhart's article with photos from the 1928 issue of Cosmopolitan magazine.

It was a natural transition for her to move to creating and designing a fashion line. After seeing the movie, I had assumed that Amelia Earhart merely licensed her name to a manufacturer of clothing and that she was simply the promoter for the line. After digging into her biographical material, her long forgotten press interviews and exhibits at various museums, I was surprised to learn that she was actively involved in her fashion line. She created her line’s samples using her own sewing machine and dress form with the help of a seamstress in New York.

Pictured: The designer at work, Amelia drapping her garment on a dress form.

The original Amelia Earhart clothing line included dresses, blouses, pants, suits, and hats. I have not found any information about the line including a leather bomber jacket, although this is the fashion item most commonly associated with Amelia today.

Amelia was much more than the front person and model for Amelia Earhart Fashions. Her mother said she was so involved in the creation of Amelia Earhart Fashions that the effort left her exhausted. As with everything she did, in the development of her fashion line Earhart worked hard and strove for excellence. She had some original and innovative ideas about fashion design for women and fashion merchandising. Here are some of the highlights of her fashion vision:

  • She recommended practical fabrics such as Grenfell cotton (traditionally used in men's outerwear) and parachute silk.
  • The garments in her line were washable.
  • She was the first to recommend the marketing of “separates”, so that a woman did not have to buy a suit in one size. In the Amelia Earhart line you could purchase a jacket in one size, and a skirt in another size. She wanted her clothing to accommodate various sizes and shapes.
  • Amelia was a recessionista. She was budget-conscious. Her fashions were launching in the Great Depression. She told the press her goal was to bring the beauty she’d found in aviation closer to all women at prices that didn’t reach “new altitudes.” Amelia said, "I hate ruffles, and at the price I could pay, that was all I could buy. So I decided to design clothes. They are nothing exciting. Just good lines and good materials for women who lead active lives."
  • The clothes were reasonably priced. The prices were well below the haute couture lines of the 1930s offered by leading designers of the time like Elsa Schiaparelli or Lanvin. Although it was the depression, there were few "designer" fashion lines that were priced like Amelia's line. A dress was $30.00, a pair of slacks was $16.75 and a tweed suit was $55.00.
  • Her clothing line incorporated her love of flying. Her special touches included “parachute” silk raincoats with buttons shaped like propellers. In an interview she noted that her styles always included “something characteristic of aviation, a parachute cord or tie or belt, a ball bearing belt buckle, wing bolts and nuts for buttons.”
  • She added shirt tails to women’s shirts. The shirt length of the Amelia Earhart shirt was designed to be longer than shirt tails of women's shirts at the time. She was annoyed that shirt tails were often not cut long enough, so that when a woman bent over or moved, the shirt shifted and became “untucked” revealing exposed skin. Amelia said, " I made up my mind that if the wearers of the shirts I designed for any reason took time out to stand on their heads, there would still be enough shirt to stay tucked in." How very practical.


The most fascinating part of my research was trying to find out if there were any samples of Amelia’s clothing line still available today. I wondered if her designs had vanished as mysteriously as she had. I found the answer less than three hours outside of my hometown of Los Angeles, in the town of Hanford, California. Amelia was a frequent visitor to the west coast and spent time in the small town of Hanford to be close to the Fresno Airport where she gave flying lessons. During that time, she developed a close friendship with one of her students, Mary Packwood. During the course of the friendship, she gave Mary some of her clothing. She left the clothing at Mary's house in Hanford so that it would be there for her to wear whenever she came to visit. Mary Packwood preserved one of the dresses and today Amelia’s clothing is on exhibit at the Hanford Carnegie museum in Hanford, California. The exhibit contains a dress designed by Amelia and an original label from her fashion line. Here is a look at the long lost treasures.

Pictured: The dress Amelia Earhart designed and gave to her friend and flying student Mary Packwood. This dress is in the Hanford Carnegie exhibit today, in Hanford, CA.

Pictured: Amelia Earhart's Fashion Label, the little red airplane taking off complimented her signature.

In researching the lost Amelia Earhart fashion line, I found a picture of Amelia wearing one her dresses from her fashion label in a history book about the town of Hanford, CA. Below is the picture of Amelia in one of the two-piece dresses she designed. Amelia's biographer Susan Bulter notes that Amelia liked simple silk dress and jacket combinations. Comfort was the goal of her designs. Sewing patterns of her designs were sold through the Woman's Home Companion magazine. During her lifetime, her designs were featured in Woman's Home Companion magazine alongside those of French designer Lanvin. Making her designs available as sewing patterns was another way for Amelia to make her designs economically accessible to women during the depression.

Pictured: Amelia Earhart in a dress from her Amelia Earhart Fashion line in 1934.

In this picture, you can almost feel the comfort of the garment, and you can see its loose, flowing design. Clearly, Amelia Earhart Fashion was about looking feminine, not just wearing khakis and goggles. Amelia said, "I tried to put the freedom that is in flying into the clothes."

Another example of an Amelia suit/dress exists in the Amelia Earhart Birthplace Museum in Atchison, Kansas. The suit is displayed alongside pictures of Amelia wearing the garment.

Pictured: A replica of the dress Amelia designed and wore in 1935 on a visit to Atchison, Kansas. This picture is from the Amelia Earhart Birthplace Museum in Atchison, Kansas.

Despite its initial popularity, Amelia Earhart Fashion did not survive. After the original launch at 20 department stores in the United States, the line was not financially successful and folded. Given the economic conditions of the 1930s, this was not a surprise. After all, fashion, even if designed by an innovator like Amelia Earhart, was not a necessity at a time when all over the world people were unemployed and standing in breadlines. Amelia did not loose money on her fashion line, but she did not make money on it either.

Fortunately, Amelia’s place in American fashion survives and we can see some of her original designs today. The style of her fashion line had little to do with the aviator fashion line created by Jean Paul Gaultier for Hermes. She had a style and elegance that went beyond flight clothing. Her elegant two-piece floral dress in the Hanford museum, with its complimentary strand of pearls, looks like it’s ready to take flight and carry on her dream of affordable, accessible fashion.